2015’ல் நாகாலாந்தில் உள்ள திமாப்பூரில் நடந்த ஒரு முக்கியமான சம்பவம் தான் இந்த பதிவு
இந்தியாவில் நாளுக்குநாள் பெருகிவரும் கற்பழிப்பு செயல்களை கண்டு கொதித்த மக்கள், எதையும் செய்யகூடியவர்கள் எதற்கும் தயங்க மாட்டார்கள் என்பதை எடுத்துகாட்டும் நிகழ்வுதான் இது.
இந்த பதிவை தமிழாக்கம் செய்ய நேரமில்லாததால் விக்கிபீடியாவில் இருந்து அப்படியே ‘காப்பி-பேஸ்ட்’ செய்கிறேன்.
நேரடியாக விக்கிபீடியாவில் வாசிக்க
2015 Dimapur mob lynching refers to a case of mob lynching that took place in Dimapur, Nagaland in India, on 5 March 2015. A mob of about 7000-8000 people broke into a prison, dragged a man detained under suspicion of rape out of the Dimapur Central Jail, paraded him naked and beat him to death in a case of vigilante justice.
The incident took place in the backdrop of widespread public anger over rising sexual violence against women in India and a controversy over a ban on the documentary India’s Daughter, based on the 2012 Delhi gang rape, and concerns in Nagaland over illegal immigration from Bangladesh.
According to the first information report (FIR) filed by the victim, a 20-year-old student of Shri Digamber Jain Girls’ College, she was raped in Hotel De Oriental Dream in Dimapur on 23 February 2015. The accused Farid Khan and his accomplice Nikavi alias Ngukav forcibly assaulted her and intoxicated her. Then Farid Khan had allegedly raped her multiple times. The accused and his accomplice were arrested on 25 February 2015 for rape and assault, and lodged in Dimapur Central Jail. They had been charged under Indian Penal Code sections 476, 344 and 363.
The rape victim later in an interview claimed that she had been given ₹5,000 by the accused to remain silent about the incident. She said that the man was known to her as her neighbor and his wife belonged to the same village as her. She also said that she was lured into a car by a friend, who then left. The man then intoxicated her and raped her several times. She later reported it to the police and handed over the money.The accused Farid Khan told Nagaland Police in his interrogation that he had consensual sex with her for which he gave her money.
Identity of the man
Initially, the man was thought to be an illegal infiltrator from Bangladesh. The accused was later named as Syed Farid Khan, a 35-year-old used car businessman. Originally from, Karimganj district of Assam, he had been living in Nagaland for 8 years. He was married to a Nagaland woman for 4 years and had a three-year-old daughter. Two of his brothers were in the Indian Army. Another brother had died in service during the Kargil War. His father had retired from the Military Engineering Service (MES) of the army.
The family of the accused claimed that he was framed. One of his brothers, who also lived in Dimapur and ran a business said the woman who had filed the case was close the accused’s family and was well-acquainted with his wife. He claims that the woman had invited Farid to a hotel with some other persons on 23 February, and that she forced him to drink and demanded ₹200,000 from him. He asserts that on being refused, she filed a case the next day.
On 5 March, about 7000-8000 people broke into the Dimapur Central Jail. They dragged the accused out, while parading him naked, pelted him with stones and beat him. They dragged the accused to a clock tower about 7 km away, by tying a rope to his waist from a motorcycle. The accused died on the way. The body was displayed from the clock tower’s railings, until the police came and took it down. The Superintendent of Police Meren Jamir later said that the mob was led by a group of a few hundred school and college girls in uniforms, which prevented the police from using more force. Jamir said that the initial crowd was small and they had been repelled by lathi charges. But, later the mob returned with larger numbers. Even though 8 companies of security forces were present at the jail, they failed to stop the mob. The police later said that there was at least one former inmate of the prison, who knew the interior layout of the jail.
The police had fired blanks and tear gas at the crowd but had failed to disperse them. One member of the mob was killed and 52 members of the police were injured in the clashes. The mob also burnt 10 police vehicles.
Initially, it was reported that the man was an illegal immigrant from Bangladesh. There had been calls from local organisations to expel outsiders. The incident was also attributed to the faulty justice system of the state, which had obtained few convictions in various cases of rape. The man’s local accomplice who was lodged in same jail was left alone by the mob.
In the home state of the accused, Assam, All Assam Minority Students’ Union burnt an effigy of the Nagaland government in Nagaon, accusing the government of discriminating against minorities living in the state, and demanded an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 6 March.
On 6 March, Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi condemned the attack and discussed the matter with Home Minister Rajnath Singh and Nagaland Chief Minister T. R. Zeliang.Dimapur Deputy Police Commissioner Wezope Kenye and Superintendent of Police Meren Jamir were suspended on the evening of 6 March. The Central Jail Chief was also suspended. Residents of Nagaland were asked to avoid traveling into Assam. Shops and commercial established remained closed on 6 March in Dimapur under acurfew.
On 7 March, truckers from Assam stopped moving goods into Nagaland in protest of the incident. They also alleged they are harassed in Nagaland and asked to pay illegal tolls. Amnesty International India on 7 March demanded an investigation into the incident, calling it a serious lapse of the justice system. The curfew continued in Dimapur. Chief Minister Zeliang said there there had been administrative lapses and that relaxing the Section 177 of the CrPC, which prohibits unlawful assembly, in Nagaland was a mistake. He also said that the social media was responsible for inciting the incident. Later, Nagaland government restricted telecom services in the region. Internet was blocked for 48 hours in the state starting on the night of 7 March. SMS and MMS services were also blocked.
Also on 7 March, Chief Minister Gogoi blamed the security force of the central government for failing to protect the jail. Gogoi also claimed that the medical report had not confirmed rape. The brother of the dead also repeated the claim. The body was airlifted to the dead’s hometown in Bosla village in Karimganj district. On the same day, the rape victim in an interview claimed that she had been given ₹5,000 by the accused to remain silent about the incident. She said that the man was known to her as her neighbor and his wife belonged to the same village as her. She also said that she was lured into a car by a friend, who then left. The man then intoxicated her and raped her several times. She later reported it to the police and handed over the money.
On 8 March, the body of the man was buried in his village. About, 4000 Bengali Muslims had left Nagaland by then, fearing attacks.
On 6 March, it was reported the police was examining the CCTV footage from the Dimapur hotel where the rape allegedly took place. The Superintendent of Police Meren Jamir said that the footage showed the girl entering and leaving the room with the accused. On the same day, it was announced that Zeilang’s state cabinet had appointed Veprasa Nyekha, a retired district and sessions judge, to head a judicial inquiry commission.
On 8 March, Inspector-General of Police Wabang Jamir said from initial medical report it appeared the girl was raped and that the samples had been sent to a forensic lab.By 8 March, 22 persons had been arrested in connection of the lynching. The arrests were made after the police analysed video clips of the incidents. By 9 March, 43 persons had been arrested in case of the lynching.
Of those arrested, 25 were identified as the “core mob” group. The police found that most those who had joined the mob, had come in response to comments on two blogs: Naga Blog and Naga Spear. The protest march was initially intended to condemn the rape, but in became politically motivated. Soon afterwards, the district collector was asked to handover the accused but he refused. The mob kept vandalising sites and photographs were uploaded to the blogs. After the admin of Naga Blog began deleting posts, the people moved to Naga Spear. Instant messaging apps were also used to increase the size of the mob. The mob believed that they were lynching a Bangladeshi.
On 11 March, it was reported that the Nagaland state government informed the Ministry of Home Affairs that the alleged rapist had claimed in the interrogation after his arrest that he had never raped the victim and that it was consensual sex for which he gave her ₹5,000. But, Nagaland Chief Minister T. R. Zeliang later told The Times of India that the Ministry of Home Affairs had been misquoted by the media. Nagaland Government denied that it has stated that no rape had taken place and preliminary medical reports indicated rape and it had sent samples to the Central Forensic Laboratory in Guwahati.
On 19 March 2015, after a cabinet meeting the Nagaland government recommended a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry for the case. By then, the police had arrested 55 people and issued photos of 34 wanted suspects.
On 18 May 2015, a judicial commission, headed by retired Gauhati High Court judge B. D. Agarwal, began its investigation. The commission in a public notice asked local newspapers, associations, unions, blogs including Naga Blog and Naga Spear, principals of schools and colleges, and family members of the victims to submit written statements regarding the lynching. On 18 June 2015, it was reported that only three persons had submitted the requested statements.
குற்றம் சாற்றபட்டவனுடன் அந்த பெண் ஹோட்டலுக்குள் நுழையும் வீடியோ (இருவரும் சம்மதத்தோடு சென்றது போலவே தெரிகிறது)
இவ்வளவு பெரிய சம்பவத்துக்கு பிறகு அந்த பெண் கொடுத்த பேட்டி:
இறந்தவரின் சகோதரர் நியாயம் கேட்டு விண்ணப்பம்:
அந்த பெண் சொன்னது உண்மையோ, பொய்யோ?
பெண்ணுக்கு ஆதரவாய் போர்குரல்…
சமூக வலைதளங்களின் உதவியால் மக்கள் ஒன்றிணைப்பு
கோப உணர்வின் உச்சம்
இது திரைப்படம் அல்ல, உண்மையில் நடந்துள்ளது என்பதை எண்ணும்போது உள்ளம் நெகிழ்கிறது.
குற்றம் சாற்றபட்டவனுள் புதைந்த உண்மை…
என புரியாத புதிராகவும், கூட்டம் சேர்த்து கொலை செய்தால் தண்டனை இல்லை என்பது போற்ற தவறான உதாரணமாகவும் இருக்குறது
எது எப்படியோ, பெண்களுக்கு பாதுகாப்பு அரணாய் கோடிகணக்கில் மக்கள் இருக்கும் இந்நாட்டில் சில பன்னாடை பரதேசிகளால் களங்கம் வருகிறது என்பது வருத்தம் கொள்ள செய்யும் விசயமே.
வரும் வருடம் 2016 – அனைவரும் நல்ல வருடமாக அமைய வாழ்த்துகிறேன்
பூபால அருண் குமரன் ரா